A New Paternalism?

A New Paternalism?

the zuay). To be a rebel, to be in revolt, implied being loclwd into yo~~tlzfl~l~Ã?Â¥;ess
Far from wishing to stay young, we who wereyo~~ng
in the '50s mere ea-ger togrow up. Groimng upmeantgrmm'ng info free- dom, winch was the name of our desire.
I am reminded here of the English poet Philip Larkin's saying that his religious sympathies first began to wane zuheiz he discovered that in the Christian version of heaven one zuould becomeas a little child again. Staying a child zuas...

Share:
Read Time:

More From This Issue