A House Divided

Read Time:
3m 46sec

How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It
Back on ­Track.

By Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein. Oxford Univ. Press.
272 pp. $­26

Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein, two of political Washington’s most astute and prolific observers, have been involved with congressional reform efforts for decades. Now they have reached a point of utter dismay about Con­gress. The Broken Branch is a ­well-­documented explanation of their ­frustration.

Mann, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, have two chief complaints: Members of Congress no longer have a sense of loyalty to the institution and its constitutional responsibilities, and majority-party leaders violate all standards of openness, fairness, and decency to ram through their agendas, with the result being shoddy, ­ideology-­driven policies. Moderates in both parties, who might bridge the partisan divide, are a vanishing breed because districts are growing more politically and ideologically ­homogeneous.

Unfortunately, the best the authors can do is recommend that America return Congress to Democratic control, though they admit that Democrats may not do things any differently. Notwithstanding this partisan solution, they concede that the legislative branch’s current problems have their roots in 40 consecutive years of Democratic rule in the House, or at least in the last decade of that rule in the 1980s and early ’90s, when “cracks in the institution began to show.” But Mann and Ornstein leave no doubt that the open fissure today is primarily the responsibility of the Republican revolutionaries who came to power in 1995 under Newt ­Gingrich.

While in the minority, the authors contend, Gingrich and his firebrands launched an aggressive campaign to discredit Congress and its leaders as corrupt. Once in power, the Republicans ruled with near-total disregard for the Democratic minority’s right to participate in the legislative process. And since the election of George W. Bush in 2000, they say, congressional Republicans have been little more than presidential handmaidens. Expressing shock that Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert ­(R-­Ill.) announced proudly “that his primary responsibility . . . was to pass the president’s legislative program,” they take Republicans to task for distorting the Speaker’s role as a neutral House officer, “above normal party politics.” Yet in 1992, when Mann and Ornstein issued the first report of their Renewing Congress Project, they called for strengthening the Speaker’s powers as party leader (though it’s clear from the report that they were not contemplating a Republican Speaker).

The authors do not point to some past “golden age” as a model to resurrect; nor do they offer a ­yet-­to-­be-­tried ideal that is in any way practicable. Committee government gave us arrogant and autocratic chairmen, while today’s party government can produce haughty, ­hammer-­handed leaders. Voters, Mann and Ornstein conclude, are the only ones who can mend the broken branch, if they are given proper guidance from leaders “intent on shaking up the existing party system.” In this regard, they foresee the possibility of a presidential candidate emerging in the next election, Teddy Roosevelt fashion, “to build a political center where none now exists.” In a book devoted to restoring Congress’s ­self-­image and independence, a president seems a peculiar ­savior—­especially a ­TR ­type. He barely got along with his more conservative party leaders in Congress and had a tendency to bypass them altogether, using executive ­orders.

In the end, The Broken Branch offers few realistic prescriptions for Congress other than closer adherence to the rules (known as “regular order”), greater institutional loyalty, and more deliberation. The authors are vague about how these admirable goals are to be achieved without replacing members of Congress with apolitical philosopher-kings or sending them all to a cultural ­re-­education camp. They never grapple with the central reality of Congress: Its members are ­re-­election seekers whose primary loyalty is not to their party, president, or institution, but to their constituents. Their parties keep them in office with generous servings of pork and plenty of time off to spend with their ­constituents—­meaning less time in Washington for deliberation and oversight. Changing that reality would require voters to insist that their representatives ignore their parochial interests and work full time on the national interest. Now that would be a paradigm ­shift.

—Don Wolfensberger

More From This Issue